Propaganda toolbox

Prezi presentation by Prof. Iurii about the 50 propaganda techniques

1. Simplification

Binary picture of the world. All-or-nothing, black or white, no nuancesThis kind of simplification is a way to propagate to peopleBut: If you nuance your opinion, propaganda looks more believable

2. Repetition

What is said many times, on all sides, is trueBut: if there is too much repetition, the spread of the message becomes counterproductive

3. Slogans

Slogans and are catchy words.But: if you pick the wrong ones, you are going to lose bigly

4. Euphemisms

The attitude towards phenomena is largely determined by how you call them. “Our heroic agent — their despicable spy”.But: If your false words to describe reality are too far from reality, people lose faith in what you say

5. Framing and reframing

so-called “narratives”, reconsideration, revisionism, alternative vision, etcBut: the audience is gained slowly, most likely you will have just a tiny portion

6. Distortion 

Focusing on the unimportant, ignoring the essentialBut: you never know what will actually be the most important

7. Emotional attack

But: the effect will not last long

8. Outflanking

make feature films about your values, and not shout about them from an openly political platform.But: this is a path that requires time and investment

9. Reflexive control

But: complicated combinations often fail

10. Sowing despair

Sowing disbelief and skepticismBut: you need to maintain these moods constantly

11. Setting the limits of the discussion

But: for this you need to control the information space

12. Appeal to authority

But: in the 21st century people trust authorities less and less

13. False analogy

But: your analogy should be effective and understandable

14. Trolling

Trolling and auto-trollingBut: people are more sympathetic to those who laugh at themselves, not at others

15. Name-calling

 Labeling / Stigmatization (“Enemy of the people,” “terrorist,” “pervert”)But: if a person or group is stigmatized too much, it can arouse compassion or even sympathy.

16. Trojan horse

Trojan horse: a trap for your opponentBut: you can come across an experienced gatekeeper who will not let your horse into the city

17. Multisensory spectacle

But: this requires a talented art director

18. Cherry picking

Biased selection of factsOne-sided presentation of information, even if factually trueBut: there will always be those who will tell the other side of the story

19. Accosiations

Activation of the subconscious network of associationsBut: you need to feel the society very subtly to predict its emotions

20. Active Seeker

Transforming a passive recipient of information into an active seekerBut: people prefer to scroll, not make decisions

21. Fear trading

Encouragement to action.A person who has joined an organization and has already taken action (especially a crime, such as a terrorist attack) or has cut off ties with an important part of their life is much less likely to change his mind and withdraw.But: there will always be fewer people willing to take action than willing not to do it

22. Epidemic spread of memes

 Epidemic spread of memes / hashtags / strong emotionsBut: you never actually know which memes / hashtags / strong emotions will actually get viral

23. Multiplication of voices

“The spiral of silence”, “50 Cent Army”; “Death by a thousand cuts”. Formation of the mainstream, the norm, the acceptable version due to the number of media actors who spread this version(s) and ridicule the other(s). Troll factories.
But: troll factories require investment

24. Multiplication of versions

The easiest way to hide the truth is behind tons of lies. The more different versions of an event, the less the truth costs.If you launch a multitude of different versions, they may be worthless and contradict each other, but they will confuse an everyman, make him lose hope of finding the truth. Tocqueville’s method: “The only way to neutralize the influence of newspapers is to multiply their number”.But: It is necessary to control the lion’s share of the information field to be an authoritarian government media empire.

25. Love as a weapon

 If you respond to your enemy’s aggression with a friendly, peaceful gesture, the audience will appreciate it and give you the moral upper hand.
But: if your supporters are implacable towards your opponents, they may perceive it as a betrayal.

Specifically for Politics

26. Populism 

Glittering Generalities.Using emotional, inflated phrases, which have no real value, but everyone is ready to agree with.But: you will immediately be called a populist

27. Silencing strategy

● Complete blackoutTopic is entirely absent from media. (Example: No reporting on protests or failures).● UnderreportingIssue is mentioned briefly but not developed; Buried in minor sections.

28. Bandwagon effect

People want to be on the side of success:People are more likely to adapt an idea, belief, or behavoir if they believe that "everyone else is already doing it."
● Psychological basisHumans are social creatures; we tend to conform to the majority because it feels safer, more legitimate, and less risky.Propagandists exploit this instinct by presenting their cause as already popular or inevitable."Don't be left behind - join the winning side." 
But: As soon as you lose the halo of a winner, the crowd under the bandwagon will disperse just as easilyOrigin

Illustration
Illustration
Illustration

Damon Centola"Social proof is local, not global"- people don't make choices based on what "everyone out there" is doing but on what their own community is doing.- A bevavior that looks "normal" in your close circle carries more weight than global statistics- This explains why mass advertising sometimes fails, while grassroots peer influence succeeds.

Illustration
Illustration

29. The principle of contrast

- We don't evaluate things in absolute terms - we judge them relative to what they are compared with.- If you lift a light object after a heavy one, it feels lighter than it really is- Start with extreme demands. When you "compromise", the other side feels they got a fairer deal, even if the end results favors you.
But: your representative cannot be the worst

30. Astroturfing

Imitation of a request from societyThe illusion of a genuine, grassroots support for a cause, product, or political movement when in reality it is orchestrated and funded by powerful organizations, governments, or interest groups. The name comes from AstroTurf (artifical grass), implying that the "grassroots" movement isn't real - it's fake.
But: if no one takes up the initiative, it will remain off the agenda
● Russia- Destabilizing demotratic institutions- Undermining trust in society and media- Amplifying social and political division-Advancing pro-Russian political outcomes globally- More or less successful troll campaigns in the US, UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland, Moldova, Baltic states etc.
● China- Coordinates inauthentic campaings on social media platforms like Facebook, X and TikTok.- Elections in Taiwan - discredit Democratic Progressive Party.- Protests in Hong-Kong, 2019 - to sow political discord amoung protesters- Covid-19 "China's successful fight against Covid"; Criticism of the US for its failure to contain the virus; To deflect blame for the start of the pandemic.

Illustration
Illustration
Illustration

31. Creating a problem

Creating a problem / a threat ... in order to be solving it. Forever.
● If you work as a cat ... Overestimate the threat from mice (and the importance of your job);Never catch all the mice at onceAllow/encourage the creation of new mouse organizations (so that they can be triumphantly defeated).Always make the mice seem more coordinated than they are (evenrandom movement becomes a "network" or "plot"). Report successes loudly, failures quielty (one caught mouse = heroic victory; ten escaped = not mentioned)Occasially stage a dramatic near-failure (to remind everyone what could happen without you).Kepp the owner slightly anxious, but not panicked (enough fear to justify your role, not enough to demand change.)More about the cat: Redefine success so it´s nver final ("The absence of mice proves they are hiding better").Discourage independent verfication (only the can can "properly assess" the mouse situation).Create specialized categories of mice ("field mice", "urban mice", "elite mice" - each required seperate attention).Rotate attention between different mouse threats (this prevents the owner from noticing patterns or lack of progress).Frame inactivitiy as strategic patience ("I am not lazy, I am monitoring the situation").Emphasize unpredictability "Mice could strike at any moment" - even if the don't).
But: be careful not to be accused of not having a solution
● Witch huntsExamples: - Which hunt (in proper sense)- Dreyfus Affair- Stalinist purges- Senator McCarty's campaign in the 1950s.- Cultural revolution
Features in common:- presumption of guilt- weak or symbolic evidence- emotional or moral panic- pressure to confess- ocial or institutional punishment

32. Whistleblowing 

Whistleblowing and false whistleblowing● Selective leaks● Fake leaks● Amplifying genuine leaks
Intelligence agencies or governments plant leaks through "fake insiders" to discredit opponents.Even when leaks are real, propaganda outlets can cherry-pick, exaggerate, or misframe the revelations to fit their narrative.The whistle-blower is portrayed as a hero fighting the corrupt system, even if the "leak" was strategically orchestrated.But: Dissidents need to have a spotless reputation.
● Udo UlfkotteGerman journalist, worked for FAZ.In 2014 he published the book "Gekaufte Journalisten" ("Bought Journalists"), where he claimed:Western journalists (including himself) were bribed or pressured by intelligence agencies (CIA, BND, NATO) to publish pro-American, anti-Russian articles. Media outlets in Germany were controlled by U.S. interests.Russian state outlets (RT, Sputnik) heavily promoted Ulfkotte´s story as "proof" that Western journalism is fake and controlled by Washington.

33. Baptists and bootleggers

Baptists - moral crusaders who opposed alcohol on ethical grounds.Bootleggers - illegal sellers who profited from alcohol bans.Both groups supported Prohibition but for different reasons. Together they created a powerful, unlikely coalition.Different kinds of people around a common causeBut: motley unions don’t last long
Examples:● Climate PolicyBaptists: Environmental activists advocating for green policies to save the planet.Bootleggers: Corporations that benefit from subsides, carbon credits, or regulatory barries that hurt competitors.● Internet CensorshipBaptists: Advocates who say censorship protects children or democracy.Bootleggers: Governments or tech giants who gain control over information flows.

34. Transfer

Transfer the prestige and reputation of a company, country etc, onto oneself)Occurs when a propagandist associaates the authority, prestige, or posirive qualities of one thing (symbol, person, idea) with another in order to make the second thing appear more acceptable or desireable.
But: you never know how this brand will be viewed tomorrow

● Flag

Illustration

● Chávez

Illustration

35. Smear

Attaching a disgusting, shocking, or stigmatizing association to a person or idea, even without proof, so that the negative impression sticks.Introduce a shocking accusation (corruption, perversion, betrayal, etc), Repeat or circulate it even without evidence. The audience remembers the association, not the truth.● "Mud sticks"- "Where there is smoke, there is fire."- "The accusation was false, but the suspicion lingered."- "Some people say you are a camel."

Illustration

36. False flag operation

Presenting a partisan actor as "independent experts", "ordinary citizens", or "grassroots activists". Example: A Think Tank funded by an oil company presented as neutral "climate research institute".
● False identity trollsTrolls create fake local identities to appear authentic, knowledgeable, and relatable. Builds credibility "I'm one of you".Makes foreign interference look like domestic option.Can amplify internal divisions (e.g. race, language, religion).
- Russia' s Internet Research Agency (IRA): In 2016 elections, trolls poses as American activists (left-wing and right-wing), creating Facebook pages like "Blacktivists" or "Heart of Texas."- Taiwan (2020 elections): Chinese-linked accounts pretended to be Taiwanese citizens criticicing President Tsai Ing-wen, to make propaganda look like genuine local frustration.- Australia & Malaysia: Chinese troll farms reportedly posed as local voters in Mandarin- and English-language spaces to shape debates on China' s rol ein trage, security, and diaspora relations.
● Hate proxy trolls- Trolls deliberately post extreme, racists, or hateful content while posing as supporters of an opposing side.- Discredits opponents: makes tehm look intolerant or violent.- Alienates moderates: Drives people away from the target movement.- Polarizes society: Deepens mistrust between groups.
● How it works

Illustration


37. Ridicule the enemy 

Ridicule the enemy and his arguments "The enemy must be reduced to a caricature."Shrinking the enemy visually or verbally makes them seem less threatening or more absurd.(Destroying the enemy’s arguments)This is what makes the mediom of comedy so effective and important in this case. It can point out the absurdities of strongman dictatorships more bluntly than a drama where the audience would have to do more thinking to really notice the absurdity of the situations. - Alex Wisement

Illustration
Illustration

38. Demonize the enemy

Portraying an opponent not just as wrong or dangerous, but as fundamentally as evil, immoral, monstrous or inhuman, morally corrupt, existentially dangerous (a threat to survival, culture, or civilization);
This shifts the audience's mindset from disagreement to moral outrage and even fear.
Justifies extreme actions- If the enemy is "evil" or "inhuman", then harsh measures (violence, cencorship, repression) seems acceptable or even necessary.
Strengthens in-group identity: " We are good because they are evil."
But: Ridicule and demonization don’t match together well 
Ayatollah Khomeini, 1979: "In this revolution, the Great Satan is America that gathers around other devils blatantly... If we see the US, this great Satan, raising chain and bringing around him, it is because the US grip over our country and our curtailed".

39. Rumors fabrication


Fabricate rumours about your enemyBut: the rumours need a fuel to travel far

40. Reductio ad Hitlerum

Draw parallels between the enemy and Nazism"As online discussion of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 100%".
"It seems as if scacely a day goes by without Hitler and the Nazis in one way or antoher - in newspaper, films, books, on radio and television - entering into our public consciousness". - Ian Kershaw
"The fact is, there is simply so much material available upon which to draw. Unkike regimes of Stalin, Pol Pot or Mao Tse-tung, the Nazis left behind troves of documentary evidence and, to this day, further proof of the depravity and strengeness of their time in power continues to emerge and be lapped up by Fleet Street." - John Jewell.
But: your opponent will do the sameBut: the further you go, the more trivial this method becomes

Illustration

41. Brainwashing 

Intensive, systematic attempt to completely reshape a person's beliefs, identity, and behavior, usually by controlling information, environment, and psychological pressure. 
But: it requires a combination of elements such as isolation, alternating carrot and stick, prolonged control over the individual, influence from both “prison guards” and “cellmates”.● STASI"Zersetzung"Manipulation in the apartment when the owners are not there:- removing painitngs from the walls- replacing one type of tea with another- swapping sugar and salt- pouring poison and using fake medicines
Workin with the victims relatives:- sending provocative anonymous letters, telegrams- telephone calls
Sowing distrust inside a family or group:- compromising photographs, often faked;- provoking extramarital affairs ("Romeo" agents);- appointing members of target groups to administrative positions, providing privileges, such as housing or a personal car in order to make others believe that this was a reward for cooperation with the authorities.

Illustration

42. Decoy effect

introducing a third option (the decoy) that makes one of the original two options look more attractive. The decoy is never meant to be chosen - it only exists to nudge people torward the "target choice."● Brexit discussions (2016)Option A: Remain in EU.Option B: No-deal hard Brexit (decoy) Option C: Negotiated Brexit (target).Many voters viewed C as the "reasonable" option, even if the deal terms were unfavorable. ● RussiaAllows fringe nationalist or communist voices in parlament to make United Russia appear "moderate."● HungaryOrbán sometimes amplifies radical voices so that Fidesz appears pragmatic by comparison.● A regime may allow a weak or extreme opposition party (decoy) so that its own rule looks like only stable choice.

Illustration

43. Sandwich people - Sugarcoating manipulation

The "sandwich" method means placing a negative, manipulative, or controversial message between two positive or neutral onces. This makes the difficult part easier to swallow - just like hiding something unpleasant in a sandwich.● Praise - Attack - PraiseBegin with a positive message (to build trust). Insert the hostile, manipulative, or false claim. End with another positive or reassuring message (to soften resistance).Example:"We admire the hardworking people of country X. Unfortunately, their leaders are corrupt and dangerours. But we believe the people of X deserve peace and prosperity."The central attack gets legitimized by the positive wrapping.
● Often used by politicands agains opponents or groups.Example: "The opposition has some talented leasers. But their policies would destroy our economy Still, I believe they can cooperate with us in the future." The criticism sounds less aggressive, but the damage is done.● Good news - bad news - good news

44. Whataboutism

● Whataboutism is a rhetorical tactic where, instead of addressing criticism or a problem, the speaker diverts attention by saying: "What about [something else]?".● It doesn´t solve the issue, it shifts blame, creates false equivalence, or distracts the audience.● Instead of answering the accusation, the propagandist brings up another issue. When criticized for consorship, a government responds: "What about racism in your country?"● Used to suggest that everyone is equally guilty, so no one should be blamed"You accuse us of curruption, but what about your own politicians taking bribes?"● Overwhelming audiences with competing examples so that the original critique is forgotten"Yes, we invaded a country, but what about your interventions in Iraq, Libya, Vietnam?"

45. Illusion of independent conclusion

● leading to a conclusion guided discovery● It is not about the directly telling people what to thinks - it is about guiding them to "discover" the desired conclusion themselves.● The audience believes they reached their own judgment, while in reality their reason was steered by carefully chosen cues, framing, and context.
Leading questions- "If NATO keeps expanding eastward, what choice does Russia have?".- "Why is the government hiding the truth about inflation?" (- assumes dishonesty)- "How much has corruption in Brussels cost ordinary Hungarians?" (- assumes corruption is a fact.)- "Would you rather vote for the candidate who protects our families, or one who supports dangerous migrats? (- frames the choice with loaded language.)- "Don`t you want a treatment that finally works" (- suggests other treatments don´t.)- "How many lives could we save if everyone used the vaccine?" (- assumes the solution is obvious.)

Illustration

- "ordinary citizens", - "independent experts"- "leaked documents".
That seems authentic, so audiences trust them more than offciial statements.

● "Do your own research" TrapConspiracyy communities encourage people to investigate - but only within a biased pool of sources. Results: people feel empowered, but they are funneled to a pre-set conclusion.

Illustration

46. Dehuminization

Portraying opponents, minorities or enemies as less than human - animals, diseases, objects - to justify hatred, exclusion or violence. What makes this tool efficent?

Rwanda (1994)Tutsis called "cockroaches" on "Radio Television Libre des Mille Collines (RTLM)".A review of the propaganda themes exploited by RTLM highlights its obvious inclination to play on two fronts. The first is associated with racists ardour against the Tutsi "cockroaches" and teh second pertains to the legitimacy of the elimination of these "cockroaches" by the "majority people". The first front, which is ethnoracial, surfaces when journalists se epithets such as "dogs" or "nakes" when reffering to Tutsi, accusing them of "canibalism and mercilessly welcoming their disappearance.

Illustration
Illustration

47. Flood the zone with shit

Instead of carefully crafting one "truth", propagandists release a torrent of conflicting stories, half-truths, lies, conspiracy theories, and emotional noise.The goal is not to convince people of one narrative - it is to:● overload attention - too much to process● Create cynicisim - "everyone is lying, no one knows the truth"● Paralyse judgement - "there is no point in checking facts"● Dominate the conversation - your opponents can't get their message across

Illustration
Illustration

China and COVID-19 origins:State-linked accounts spread multiple competing theories. US military brought COVID, Italy was first, frozen food imports carried it, etc. By flooding with conflicting "maybes", Beijing made it harder to pin responsibility.

Illustration

48. Background influence

Sharping perception by the environment and cues surrounding the message rather than the message itself.

Illustration

49. Anchoring

is a cognitive bias in which initial information serves as a reference point that systematically biases subsequent judgments.
What determines our perception of the price?

Expectation Management

Illustration

Questions for group 1: a) Does the average American eat more or less than 22 kilograms of meat per year? b) How much meat does the average American eat per year?Question for group 2:a) Does the average American eat more or less than 440 kilograms of meat per year?
b) How much meat does the average American eat per year?

50. Big lie

Spreading a massive, schocking falsehood, so extreme that people are more likely to believe it, because they assume no one would dare invent something on such a scale.A grand, sweeping claim is introdced, which is repeated constantly.It appleas to strong emotions (fear, anger, identity).Feels like a "common knowledge". No evidence is needed.

Illustration
Illustration

51. Proximity to the people

Proximity to the people / Plain folks ; “I am one of you”But: A political leader who is too fond of populism risks losing his sacredness

Further material

SemEval-2020 Task 11: Detection of Propaganda Techniques in News ArticlesGiovanni Da San Martino, Alberto Barron-Cede, Henning Wachsmuth, Rostislav Petrov, Preslav Nakov

Made with